Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 18(3): 265-271, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28125548

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the Safer Dx Instrument, a structured tool for finding diagnostic errors in primary care, can be used to reliably detect diagnostic errors in patients admitted to a PICU. DESIGN AND SETTING: The Safer Dx Instrument consists of 11 questions to evaluate the diagnostic process and a final question to determine if diagnostic error occurred. We used the instrument to analyze four "high-risk" patient cohorts admitted to the PICU between June 2013 and December 2013. PATIENTS: High-risk cohorts were defined as cohort 1: patients who were autopsied; cohort 2: patients seen as outpatients within 2 weeks prior to PICU admission; cohort 3: patients transferred to PICU unexpectedly from an acute care floor after a rapid response and requiring vasoactive medications and/or endotracheal intubation due to decompensation within 24 hours; and cohort 4: patients transferred to PICU unexpectedly from an acute care floor after a rapid response without subsequent decompensation in 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: Two clinicians used the instrument to independently review records in each cohort for diagnostic errors, defined as missed opportunities to make a correct or timely diagnosis. Errors were confirmed by senior expert clinicians. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Diagnostic errors were present in 26 of 214 high-risk patient records (12.1%; 95% CI, 8.2-17.5%) with the following frequency distribution: cohort 1: two of 16 (12.5%); cohort 2: one of 41 (2.4%); cohort 3: 13 of 44 (29.5%); and cohort 4: 10 of 113 (8.8%). Overall initial reviewer agreement was 93.6% (κ, 0.72). Infections and neurologic conditions were the most commonly missed diagnoses across all high-risk cohorts (16/26). CONCLUSIONS: The Safer Dx Instrument has high reliability and validity for diagnostic error detection when used in high-risk pediatric care settings. With further validation in additional clinical settings, it could be useful to enhance learning and feedback about diagnostic safety in children.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 31(6): 602-8, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26902245

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Diagnostic errors are common and harmful, but difficult to define and measure. Measurement of diagnostic errors often depends on retrospective medical record reviews, frequently resulting in reviewer disagreement. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the accuracy of an instrument to help detect presence or absence of diagnostic error through record reviews. DESIGN: We gathered questions from several previously used instruments for diagnostic error measurement, then developed and refined our instrument. We tested the accuracy of the instrument against a sample of patient records (n = 389), with and without previously identified diagnostic errors (n = 129 and n = 260, respectively). RESULTS: The final version of our instrument (titled Safer Dx Instrument) consisted of 11 questions assessing diagnostic processes in the patient-provider encounter and a main outcome question to determine diagnostic error. In comparison with the previous sample, the instrument yielded an overall accuracy of 84 %, sensitivity of 71 %, specificity of 90 %, negative predictive value of 86 %, and positive predictive value of 78 %. All 11 items correlated significantly with the instrument's error outcome question (all p values ≤ 0.01). Using factor analysis, the 11 questions clustered into two domains with high internal consistency (initial diagnostic assessment, and performance and interpretation of diagnostic tests) and a patient factor domain with low internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficients 0.93, 0.92, and 0.38, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Safer Dx Instrument helps quantify the likelihood of diagnostic error in primary care visits, achieving a high degree of accuracy for measuring their presence or absence. This instrument could be useful to identify high-risk cases for further study and quality improvement.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Humanos , Prontuários Médicos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Texas
3.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 95(6): 2133-9, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23602063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Children undergoing cardiac surgery may receive corticosteroids preoperatively to temper cardiopulmonary bypass-related inflammation, postoperatively for hemodynamic instability, and periextubation to reduce airway edema. Recent data have associated preoperative corticosteroids with infection. We aimed to determine if there is a relationship between cumulative corticosteroid exposure and infection. METHODS: A retrospective review of children who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution from January 2009 to July 2010 was performed. To limit study heterogeneity, patients who were 5 years or younger with basic Aristotle score of 7 or higher and intensive care unit stay of 7 days or more were included. Infections during the first 30 postoperative days were recorded, defined as clinically relevant positive blood, urine, respiratory, or wound cultures, or culture-negative sepsis treated with 7 or more days of antimicrobial therapy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for infection. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were reviewed. All patients received intraoperative methylprednisolone, 48% received postoperative hydrocortisone, and 86% received periextubation dexamethasone. Twenty-six patients (36%) had 58 infections. On univariate analysis, patients with infection had greater median comprehensive Aristotle score (14.5 [intraquartile range (IQR): 12.5 to 16] versus 11.5 [IQR: 10 to 13.1], p = 0.001), maximum vasoactive inotrope score (29 [IQR: 24 to 40] versus 24 [IQR: 17 to 31], p = 0.031, days endotracheally intubated (12 [IQR: 7 to 30] versus 5 [IQR: 4 to 6.5], p < 0.001), and days of corticosteroid exposure (7 [IQR: 5 to 12] versus 4 [IQR: 2 to 5), p < 0.001). Also, patients with infections more often underwent delayed sternal closure (p = 0.008). On multivariate analysis, days endotracheally intubated (p = 0.023) and days of corticosteroid exposure (p = 0.015) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: For children undergoing complex cardiac surgery, greater cumulative duration of corticosteroid exposure is independently associated with postoperative infection.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/mortalidade , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Infusões Intravenosas , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
4.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 14(3): 290-7, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23392370

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and severity of hyponatremia after initiation of arginine vasopressin therapy in children recovering from cardiothoracic surgery, and to compare these patients with a control group with similar disease complexity and severity who did not receive arginine vasopressin. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: PICU at a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients who received arginine vasopressin for at least 6 hours during the first 48 postoperative hours following cardiothoracic surgery were compared with 47 patients who did not receive arginine vasopressin. After surgery, all patients received intravenous fluids consisting of dextrose and 0.22% saline for daily fluid requirements as well as isotonic colloid and blood products as needed for additional resuscitation. RESULTS: Mean initial postoperative serum sodium did not differ between groups, 144.6 ± 3.4 in those patients who received arginine vasopressin and 144.5 ± 3.7 in those who did not, p = 0.969. Mean lowest sodium in the first 72 hours, however, was 134.7 ± 3.8 in those who received arginine vasopressin as compared with 137.1 ± 4.3 in the control group, p = 0.019. Hyponatremia occurred in 14 of the patients (48%) who received arginine vasopressin but only in 8 of the patients (17%) in the control group, p = 0.004. Mean age, weight, sex, Aristotle score, and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass were not statistically different between groups. Mean volumes of hypotonic fluids administered and cumulative diuretic dosing during the first 72 hours post-surgery were also not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hyponatremia occurred in nearly half of the infants and children receiving arginine vasopressin therapy in this study. Clinicians should be aware of this association, monitor serum sodium values closely, and consider providing less free water to these patients before hyponatremia occurs.


Assuntos
Arginina Vasopressina/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Hiponatremia/induzido quimicamente , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Vasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversos , Arginina Vasopressina/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hiponatremia/epidemiologia , Soluções Hipotônicas , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Vasculares/etiologia , Doenças Vasculares/terapia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...